I have heard recently of three different situations in which clergy have been the target of cruel attacks by people in the congregation. It is not unusual for the attack to be anonymous: a cruel note degrading the minister’s character or competency left without a signature, or comments passed along by a third party that “a lot of people are saying . . . ” Often this way of treating another human being is a long-standing pattern in the congregation. Other members of the congregation know that this has been happening and even know who the perpetrators are.
Advice has been offered by other clergy who have been through similar experiences. (A great resource is the Clergy Support Network)
Some of the advice that is offered is psychological:
“Keep reminding yourself: ‘It’s not about you’. You are the target of somebody else’s emotional or psychological issues.” Kathy Smith, in Stilling the Storm provides a helpful image: think of yourself as being the person carrying the ball in a football game. People are attacking you, not because you are doing anything wrong or because they don’t like you. They are attacking you because you’re carrying the ball. Very often, the situation really is not ‘about you’. However, many of us still have to do our own emotional and psychological work in order to distance ourselves from the hurtful comments made by others. That’s hard work but essential for ministry.
Some of the advice is systemic:
“Don’t deal with this on your own. Let your Ministry & Personnel Committee handle it. Have the Board pass a motion that anonymous comments will not be given any notice. Bring it to your [insert the relevant committee name] deal with it.” The way the congregation conducts itself is not merely the responsibility of the ordered ministry personnel. It is the responsibility of the whole Body of Christ. When I have been in such a situation, I have sometimes been told, “You need to develop a thicker skin.” That may be true sometimes, but it is also true that the congregation needs to nurture and sustain a culture that says, “This is not how we treat one another. It is not appropriate to attack another human being. Here’s how you deal with issues that arise . . . ”
Some of the advice is sociological:
When congregations are dying, they begin to exhibit toxic behaviours. I have found Alan Roxburgh‘s The Missional Leader helpful in navigating the way through congregational crises and the behaviour that goes with them. In the midst of the confusion, conflict and anxiety that are typical in a time of crisis, “missional leaders need to be skilled in engaging conflict and helping people live in ambiguity long enough to ask new questions about who they are as God’s people. . . Missional leaders can model ways of engaging conflict to bring about change. They must be ready to create conflict that helps people think differently, name conflict, and facilitate its resolution. They will live with conflict and still sleep at night” (p. 134 -135).
I find it interesting, however, that the apostle Paul deals with conflict as a spiritual issue. In Galatians 5, he lists the ‘works of the flesh’ (flesh being the word he uses to describe a life lived under our own power, without radically depending upon God and without referring all of life to what God has done in Jesus Christ). Included in the list are: enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions”. When people treat each other badly, it’s a sign that there’s something amiss with their spiritual life. An unhealthy congregation is a congregation with spiritual issues that need to be addressed. They have forgotten who they are in Christ and what is required to live a life ‘worthy of the calling to which they have been called” (Ephesians 4:1).
Typically, in his letters to the churches, Paul begins by talking about what God has done in Christ and about the ‘new age’ that is now present because of Christ’s death and resurrection. He immerses us in God’s grace and the gifts of the Holy Spirit and our identity as baptized followers of Christ. Then, in the last half, he speaks to relationships within the church. The way we treat each other is rooted in our relationship with God: Have we entrusted ourselves to God? Are we open to Christ’s activity in our lives and in the world? Are we willing to submit ourselves to the guidance and transforming power of the Holy Spirit?
I wonder what difference it would make if we took that connection more seriously when we find ourselves in the midst of conflict and dissension in our congregations? Certainly, there are helpful things we can do and learn psychologically, sociologically, systemically. However, what if we also recognized that spiritual issues were at the heart of the problems? What if we framed the issues between us in terms of our relationship with God? What if the congregational response to people behaving badly was to go back to basics: Who are we in Christ? What does it mean to live in radical trust in God?
People in the congregation who treat others cruelly, maliciously, manipulatively call the whole congregation to attend to their life with God. The whole church needs to attend more deeply to its spiritual growth and development, not just the person who is doing the attacking. The whole congregation needs to ask, “What is required of us in terms of spiritual growth, spiritual practices, spiritual disciplines so that we cultivate a culture in our church where that kind of behaviour is known to be unacceptable?”